Ivey…Phil Ivey

James Bond’s game of choice has always been baccarat.

James Bond at the baccarat table

James Bond at the baccarat table

A version of this popular card game is call Punto Blanco, where the player is to draw two or three cards with a sum total closer to nine than the dealer. Enter Ivy…Phil Ivey, arguably the best card player on the planet.  Last August (2012) at Crockfords’ casino in Mayfair, London, Ivy went on an unprecedented run, and turned $144,000 into $11.9 million over the course of three nights. Ivy apparently raised his bet from $77,000 a hand to $230,000 a hand (this with the casinos blessing), and at one point was $770,000 in the red…but, still ended up walking out with his pockets full…and the casino crying foul.

Here’s the casino’s take:  Ivey spotted tiny imperfections in the cards’ designs, and used that knowledge to help identify when certain cards would be on the table, even when face-down.

Via The Daily Mail

Via The Daily Mail

Whether there were imperfections on the cards or not, a person has to notice them, keep a keen eye on the game, and do the math in their heads (similar to counting cards). Not to mention this was a three-day period and there were ten “house” cameras on him. The cards were suppose to be switched out each day, but Ivey and his “female partner” allegedly asked to have the cards kept in play, day after day, and the casino obliged.

Phil Ivey

Phil Ivey

So, who’s really to blame here? Ivey who has a stellar past with no black marks against him, or the casino which got caught with their pants down? I feel the money is Iveys.  The casino is basically embarrassed for, and just trying to save face. If Ivey did indeed catch the glich, so what…”to the winner go the spoils,” the casino shouldn’t have been so “star stuck” that they forget how to be a casino…and SWITCH OUT THE CARDS!

5 thoughts on “Ivey…Phil Ivey

  1. I bet Ivey met with the dealer after the first day to give him a percentage of the winnings for the second and third day. Crockford’s will have to make up the losses by reducing the payback on the slots.

  2. I think if Crockford’s provided the cards and used them, that is not a fault of Iveys. He did not mark the cards or make the error backed cards. He can not be at fault and he certainly should not be accused of cheating for cards he never touched or handled. They need to pay off the mistake, this is not a slot machine malfunction, he gambled against the casinos cards and won, period.

  3. I have one other curiosity that has not been mentioned. Since the cards are dealt out of a shoe, how would he be able to notice the pattern backing before each hand was dealt? In baccarat style games, the cards are dealt after the bet is placed. So how on earth can they blame Ivey for betting on cards that are sight unseen prior to placing the bet? Im a player myself, and I think suing is the right move here. To call him a cheater for a game that casino provides all the equipment and dealer is character defamation as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s